Deep mentorship • Genuine ownership
Mentors stay close to the work. Students remain responsible for it.
AiMi Academy pairs ambitious students with mentors whose expertise fits the question, methods, industry, or competition pathway. Mentors teach, challenge, review, and evaluate across the full project—not simply at the beginning and end.
What deep involvement means
Guidance across the entire project.
Mentor involvement continues from the first feasibility conversation through the final evaluation and next-step recommendation.
- 01
Fit & feasibility review
- 02
Question or problem definition
- 03
Method or discovery design
- 04
Recurring milestone reviews
- 05
Evidence, analysis, or MVP critique
- 06
Communication review
- 07
Submission or presentation rehearsal
- 08
Final evaluation
The ownership boundary
Mentors strengthen the work. They do not take it over.
- Complete student research, writing, coding, or applications
- Fabricate data, interviews, validation, or outcomes
- Guarantee authorship, publication, awards, revenue, or funding
- Use affiliation to imply institutional sponsorship
- Override school, journal, conference, or competition rules
Research Academic Standards
Six standards for credible student research.
The Research Program uses clear gates to protect ethics, rigor, student ownership, and responsible communication.
- 01
Research Ethics
Students follow appropriate standards for sources, attribution, data use, authorship, conflicts, privacy, safety, and competition rules. Projects requiring formal approval may not proceed without it.
- 02
Student Ownership
Students understand, perform, document, and defend their own work. Mentors teach, review, question, and guide, but do not write or fabricate work.
- 03
Mentor Review
Mentors review intellectual logic, feasibility, methods, evidence, limitations, and communication throughout the project.
- 04
Research Milestones
Projects advance through defined gates for question, literature, methods, ethics, analysis, interpretation, draft, and presentation readiness.
- 05
Final Evaluation
Evaluation considers rigor, ownership, reasoning, execution, response to feedback, communication, and next-step readiness.
- 06
Selective Admission
Admission depends on readiness, commitment, feasibility, mentor fit, timing, and the Academy’s ability to support the work responsibly.
Founder Studio Standards
Evidence, iteration, and accountability.
Founder projects follow an equally disciplined framework built for real problem solving.
- 01
Problem Authenticity
The venture begins with a real and meaningfully investigated need.
- 02
Student Ownership
Students make and explain the key research, product, and venture decisions.
- 03
Mentor Challenge & Review
Mentors test assumptions, evidence, scope, execution, and communication.
- 04
Venture Milestones
Projects move through discovery, validation, design, MVP, testing, and pitch gates.
- 05
Final Evaluation
Students are evaluated on insight, evidence, execution, iteration, teamwork, and presentation.
- 06
Selective Admission
Entry depends on readiness, commitment, fit, feasibility, and mentor capacity.
Mentorship formats
The right structure follows the project.
Published offering details always match the actual enrollment or partnership agreement.